The Delhi High Court on Tuesday heard a plea challenging the temporary suspension of internet services near the Jantar Mantar area, a common site for protests in the Indian capital. The plea argues that the internet shutdown orders are unconstitutional and arbitrary. The petitioner claims that the suspension disrupts the right to free speech and access to information, especially for journalists and activists covering the demonstrations. Jantar Mantar has historically been used for peaceful protests, and the internet ban was imposed by authorities citing security concerns. The court did not immediately issue a verdict and is expected to continue hearings. This case highlights the ongoing debate between security measures and civil liberties in India, where internet shutdowns are frequently ordered during protests or unrest. Similar challenges have been brought before other courts in recent years. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future internet restrictions in the country.